IOS Development Has Nothing to Do With Bugs Says Former Microsoft Executive

Apple every year makes a point to release a new iteration of iOS featuring a wide array of system improvements with the release of revamped iPhone models. Well, not every iOS update is as transformative as it seems to be but over the past few years, Apple has done a solid job of adding enough compelling range of features to new versions of iOS of course to convince most users to upgrade. With iOS 12, the tech giant will be taking a different approach. I mean instead of trying to cram in as many new features possible, Apple will scale back the scope of its annual development cycle as a means to let engineers more properly focus on system performance, bug detection, and more importantly  ensuring that new and ambitious features are properly baked before being released to millions of iOS users.

Moving forward, it is reported that the company’s about-face is the direct result of a number of high-profile bugs that have impacted both iOS and macOS over the past few weeks best cell spy app. For instance, a few months ago, there was a pesky auto-correct bug in iOS 11 that auto-corrected the letter “I” and changed it to the letter “A” followed by a question mark.

As a result, Apple decided to slow down iOS development because of a higher incidence of bugs. Well, not everyone, though, views the situation from this exact perspective. Yes, I am talking about former Microsoft executive Steven Sinofsky argues that Apple’s decision to slow down the pace of iOS development has more to do with Apple adjusting to the massive popularity of the iPhone and iPad, as opposed to a new directive to better detect bugs.

What is lost in all of this recent discussion is the nuance between features, schedule, and quality. It is like having a discussion with a financial advisor over income, risk, and growth. You don’t just show up and say you want all three and get a “sure”.

What happens to a growing project over time is that processes and approaches need to re-thought. It just means that how things once scaled—tools like deciding features, priorities, est. schedules, integration test, etc—are no longer scaling as well. That happens. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Steven Sinofsky further says that the perception that Apple products are more buggy than they have ever been before is far stretch from reality. Moreover, Apple’s software and hardware has a quality that will remain incredibly high but only seems worse because Apple’s growing and gargantuan user base results in a greater total number of users experiencing software issues, even though the overall rate may be lower than ever before.

In any absolute sense the quality of Mac/iOS + h/w are at quality levels our industry has just not seen before. Think of the scale of iPhone X release. From zero to 30M in months. That’s just insane. And it works better/more reliable than just about anything else I can buy.

How does that explain general “buggy” feeling w/ so many super smart/skilled people saying products are suffering? It’s because of the depth and scale of usage that comes w/success. A responsibility.

Look, there are bugs. You (and Apple) can make a list of them. But mostly this is about change. I know people say that isn’t the case but it is. On any absolute scale number of bugs—non-working, data losing, hanging mistakes—in iOS/Mac is far far less today than ever before.

I can’t prove this but I’ve also worked on some really big projects where people said the same thing and we had tons of data. Apple has the same data. What is different is that at scale a bug that happens to 0.01% of people is a lot of people. A stadium full or more.

Published By Hufforbes – A Well-known name for iPhone app development in London.